Smoldering mastocytosis: Survival comparisons with indolent and aggressive mastocytosis

Abstract:
To the Editor: The 2016 World Health Organization (WHO) system classifies systemic mastocytosis (SM) into five categories: indolent (ISM), smoldering (SSM), SM with an associated hematological neoplasm (SM-AHN), aggressive (ASM), and mast cell leukemia (MCL). WHO morphologic distinctions within SM were based on presence or absence of B (high mast cell burden, evidence of nonmast cell morphologic dysplasia or myeloproliferation, organomegaly without functional consequence) and C (cytopenia related to mast cell infiltration, palpable organomegaly with functional consequence, skeletal involvement with large osteolytic lesions, and malabsorption with weight loss secondary to gastrointestinal mast cell infiltrates) findings, presence, or absence of an associated hematological neoplasm, and presence or absence of criteria for MCL (≥20% mast cells on bone marrow aspirate smears or ≥ 10% circulating mast cells). In general, C findings are absent in both ISM and SSM and present in ASM; SSM is distinguished from ISM by the presence of ≥2 B findings including high mast cell burden, organomegaly, and evidence for multilineage involvement. Given that SSM is clearly distinguished from ISM, as outlined above, we sought to examine the impact of this distinction on survival. The current study was approved by the institutional review board. Study patients were recruited from the Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN database for SM. Diagnoses of SM and its morphological subcategories were confirmed by both clinical and bone marrow examinations, in line with the 2016 WHO criteria. Particular attention was paid to potential C findings, in order to avoid inadvertent labeling of ASM as SSM; patients with subthreshold complete blood counts were scrutinized to clarify the contribution of bone marrow mast cell infiltrates. Next-generation sequencing was performed in a subset of the study population. Statistical analyses considered clinical and laboratory data collected at the time of initial diagnosis at the Mayo Clinic. Conventional statistics was used for calculation of survival and comparison of disease features. The JMP Pro 13.0.0 software from SAS Institute, Cary, NC, was used for all analysis. A total of 376 consecutive patients with SSM (n = 17), ISM (n = 274) or ASM (n = 85) constituted the study population. Respective values for SSM vs ISM vs ASM were age 64, 47, and 61 years; male sex percentage 47%, 43%, and 45%; median hemoglobin level 12.6, 14, and 12.3 g/dL; median platelet count 217, 260, and 219 × 10/L; presence of sex-adjusted anemia in 47%, 12%, and 52%; platelet count <150 × 10/L in 13%, 4%, and 27%; serum alkaline phosphatase (ALP) above the upper limit of normal in 82%, 35%, and 71%; and serum albumin <3.5 g/dL in 6%, 12%, and 25%. Among 69 informative cases, adverse mutations (ie, ASXL1, RUNX1, and NRAS) were not seen in 4 SSM or 39 ISM cases but were present in 4 (15%) of 26 patients with ASM. Among 191 patients with available cytogenetic studies, abnormal karyotype was seen in 12 (6%) total patients, including none of 3 cases with SSM, 8 (6%) of 139 cases with ISM, and 4 (8%) of 49 patients with ASM. Compared to ISM, SSM was associated with older age (P < .001) and, as expected from disease definition, with higher bone marrow mast cell burden (P < .001), higher serum tryptase level (<.001), higher prevalence of palpable hepatomegaly (P < .001), and palpable splenomegaly (P < .001; Supporting Information Table S1). SSM, as opposed to ISM, was also associated with adverse disease features including anemia (P = .001), thrombocytopenia (P = .03), and higher serum ALP level (P < .001); in contrast, there was no significant difference in the expression of mast cell mediator symptoms, urticaria pigmentosa, abnormal karyotype or KIT mutational frequency; the number of informative cases was too small to comment of the prevalence of non-KIT mutations, although the higher incidence of TET2 mutations in SSM would be consistent with the observed difference in age distribution (Supporting Information Table S1). In a separate analysis comparing SSM (n = 17) with ASM (n = 85), age distribution was similar (P = .4), as were most other disease features, including prevalence of KIT and non-KITmutations. After median follow-up of 32 months for ISM, 39 months for SSM, and 26 months for ASM, a total of 86 (23%) deaths and only one (0.3%) leukemic transformation was recorded; the single case of leukemic transformation occurred in a patient with ASM. In univariate analysis, survival appeared significantly shorter in SSM vs ISM (HR 5.5, 95% CI 2.8-10.2) whereas it was similar between SSM and ASM (HR 0.9, 95% CI 0.5-1.8; Figure 1). However, the significant difference in survival between ISM and SSM was not sustained during age-adjusted multivariable analysis that also included other previously established risk factors in SM, which instead confirmed the independent adverse survival effect of advanced age (P < .001) and hemoglobin level below the lower limit of the sex-adjusted hemoglobin level (P < .001). In contrast, the difference in survival between ASM and ISM remained significant during a similar multivariable analysis; HR (95% CI) were 2.0 (1.1-3.5) for ASM vs ISM, 2.2 (1.3-3.8) for sexadjusted anemia), 2.2 (1.2-3.9) for thrombocytopenia <150 × 10/L, and 2.3 (1.2-4.9) for ALP above upper limit of normal; P value for age as a continuous variable was <.001. The current study highlights the older age distribution of patients with SSM (median 64 years), which was similar to that of patients with ASM (median 61 years) but significantly different than that of patients Received: 23 September 2018 Accepted: 26 September 2018
Author Listing: Ayalew Tefferi;Sahrish Shah;Kaaren K Reichard;Curtis A Hanson;Animesh Pardanani
Volume: 94
Pages: None
DOI: 10.1002/ajh.25302
Language: English
Journal: American Journal of Hematology

AMERICAN JOURNAL OF HEMATOLOGY

AM J HEMATOL

影响因子:10.1 是否综述期刊:是 是否OA:否 是否预警:不在预警名单内 发行时间:1976 ISSN:0361-8609 发刊频率:Monthly 收录数据库:SCIE/Scopus收录 出版国家/地区:UNITED STATES 出版社:Wiley-Liss Inc.

期刊介绍

The American Journal of Hematology provides broad coverage of experimental and clinical features of blood diseases in humans and in animal models of human disease. The journal publishes original contributions in non-malignant and malignant hematological diseases including clinical and basic studies in hemostasis and thrombosis, immunology, blood banking, and stem cell biology. Clinical translational reports describing novel therapeutic approaches to diagnosis and treatment of hematological diseases are welcomed and encouraged. The journal includes regular original laboratory and clinical research articles, brief research reports, critical reviews, images in hematology, letters and correspondence.

《 美国 血液 学 杂志 》 广泛 报道 了 人类 和 人类 疾病 动物 模型 中 血液 疾病 的 实验 和 临床 特征 。该 杂志 发表 非 恶性 和 恶性 血液 病 的 原创 论文 , 包括 止血 和 血栓 形成 、 免疫 学 、 血库 和 干 细胞 生物 学 的 临床 和 基础 研究 。欢迎 并 鼓励 临床 转化 报告 描述 诊断 和 治疗 血液 疾病 的 新 治疗 方法 。该 杂志 包括 定期 原始 实验 室 和 临床 研究 文章 , 简短 的 研究 报告 , 评论 , 血液 学 图像 , 信件 和 通信 。

年发文量 175
国人发稿量 20
国人发文占比 11.43%
自引率 5.9%
平均录取率 较易
平均审稿周期 一般,3-6周
版面费 US$4800
偏重研究方向 医学-血液学
期刊官网 http://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/journal/10.1002/(ISSN)1096-8652
投稿链接 http://mc.manuscriptcentral.com/ajh

质量指标占比

研究类文章占比 OA被引用占比 撤稿占比 出版后修正文章占比
89.66% 29.12% 0.00% 0.00%

相关指数

{{ relationActiveLabel }}
{{ item.label }}

期刊预警不是论文评价,更不是否定预警期刊发表的每项成果。《国际期刊预警名单(试行)》旨在提醒科研人员审慎选择成果发表平台、提示出版机构强化期刊质量管理。

预警期刊的识别采用定性与定量相结合的方法。通过专家咨询确立分析维度及评价指标,而后基于指标客观数据产生具体名单。

具体而言,就是通过综合评判期刊载文量、作者国际化程度、拒稿率、论文处理费(APC)、期刊超越指数、自引率、撤稿信息等,找出那些具备风险特征、具有潜在质量问题的学术期刊。最后,依据各刊数据差异,将预警级别分为高、中、低三档,风险指数依次减弱。

《国际期刊预警名单(试行)》确定原则是客观、审慎、开放。期刊分区表团队期待与科研界、学术出版机构一起,夯实科学精神,打造气正风清的学术诚信环境!真诚欢迎各界就预警名单的分析维度、使用方案、值得关切的期刊等提出建议!

预警情况 查看说明

时间 预警情况
2024年02月发布的2024版 不在预警名单中
2023年01月发布的2023版 不在预警名单中
2021年12月发布的2021版 不在预警名单中
2020年12月发布的2020版 不在预警名单中

JCR分区 WOS分区等级:Q1区

版本 按学科 分区
WOS期刊SCI分区
WOS期刊SCI分区是指SCI官方(Web of Science)为每个学科内的期刊按照IF数值排 序,将期刊按照四等分的方法划分的Q1-Q4等级,Q1代表质量最高,即常说的1区期刊。
(2021-2022年最新版)
HEMATOLOGY Q1

关于2019年中科院分区升级版(试行)

分区表升级版(试行)旨在解决期刊学科体系划分与学科发展以及融合趋势的不相容问题。由于学科交叉在当代科研活动的趋势愈发显著,学科体系构建容易引发争议。为了打破学科体系给期刊评价带来的桎梏,“升级版方案”首先构建了论文层级的主题体系,然后分别计算每篇论文在所属主题的影响力,最后汇总各期刊每篇论文分值,得到“期刊超越指数”,作为分区依据。

分区表升级版(试行)的优势:一是论文层级的主题体系既能体现学科交叉特点,又可以精准揭示期刊载文的多学科性;二是采用“期刊超越指数”替代影响因子指标,解决了影响因子数学性质缺陷对评价结果的干扰。整体而言,分区表升级版(试行)突破了期刊评价中学科体系构建、评价指标选择等瓶颈问题,能够更为全面地揭示学术期刊的影响力,为科研评价“去四唯”提供解决思路。相关研究成果经过国际同行的认可,已经发表在科学计量学领域国际重要期刊。

《2019年中国科学院文献情报中心期刊分区表升级版(试行)》首次将社会科学引文数据库(SSCI)期刊纳入到分区评估中。升级版分区表(试行)设置了包括自然科学和社会科学在内的18个大类学科。基础版和升级版(试行)将过渡共存三年时间,推测在此期间各大高校和科研院所仍可能会以基础版为考核参考标准。 提示:中科院分区官方微信公众号“fenqubiao”仅提供基础版数据查询,暂无升级版数据,请注意区分。

中科院分区 查看说明

版本 大类学科 小类学科 Top期刊 综述期刊
医学
1区
HEMATOLOGY
血液学
2区
2021年12月
基础版
医学
1区
HEMATOLOGY
血液学
2区
2021年12月
升级版
医学
1区
HEMATOLOGY
血液学
2区
2020年12月
旧的升级版
医学
1区
HEMATOLOGY
血液学
2区
2022年12月
最新升级版
医学
1区
HEMATOLOGY
血液学
2区