Analyzing the interactions among barriers of sustainable supply chain management practices: A case study

Abstract:
Purpose \n \n \n \n \nThe purpose of this paper is to identify, model, analyze and prioritize the barriers in implementing sustainable practices in rubber products manufacturing industry in Kerala, a state in South India. This research provides a more reliable quantitative measure of association of the barriers in the implementation of sustainable practices in the rubber products manufacturing sector. \n \n \n \n \nDesign/methodology/approach \n \n \n \n \nInterpretive structural modeling (ISM) is used to develop the hierarchical relationships among the barriers in the implementation of sustainable supply chain practices in the rubber products manufacturing sector. The hierarchical structure among the barriers is framed using the experts’ opinion. Cross-impact matrix multiplication applied to the classification (MICMAC) analysis is integrated with the output of ISM to classify the barriers into different categories based on the driving power and the dependence power. The driving power and the dependence power of the barriers obtained from ISM constitute two criteria for prioritizing the barriers. The change management required is considered as the third criterion. The fuzzy-analytic hierarchy process (F-AHP) methodology is adopted to prioritize the barriers based on these three criteria. \n \n \n \n \nFindings \n \n \n \n \nThe hierarchical relationship obtained through ISM methodology shows that lack of government initiatives and lack of benchmark on sustainability measurement in Indian conditions are the major barriers in implementing sustainable practices in the rubber products manufacturing sector. These barriers lead to the lack of management commitment for the implementation of sustainable practices in the organizations under study. The prioritization obtained through the F-AHP method suggests that lack of top-level management commitment, lack of motivation, lack of government initiatives and high initial cost of implementation are some of the major barriers in implementing sustainable practices in the organizations. \n \n \n \n \nResearch limitations/implications \n \n \n \n \nIn the application of the ISM methodology, the contextual relationship between the barriers specified by the experts and their preferences may involve bias. Another limitation of this research is that the modeling and prioritization of the barriers are executed based on the opinion of experts from rubber product manufacturing companies in one state only. \n \n \n \n \nOriginality/value \n \n \n \n \nTo the best knowledge of the authors, this research is the first study on the identification and prioritization of the barriers in sustainable supply chain implementation in the rubber products manufacturing sector. Modeling the inter-relationship among the barriers using ISM technique and prioritizing the barriers using F-AHP are the novel features of the contributions of this work.
Author Listing: Anilkumar Elavanakattu Narayanan;R. Sridharan;P. N. Ram Kumar
Volume: 30
Pages: 937-971
DOI: 10.1108/JMTM-06-2017-0114
Language: English
Journal: Journal of Manufacturing Technology Management

Journal of Manufacturing Technology Management

J MANUF TECHNOL MANA

影响因子:7.3 是否综述期刊:否 是否OA:否 是否预警:不在预警名单内 发行时间:- ISSN:1741-038X 发刊频率:- 收录数据库:SCIE/Scopus收录 出版国家/地区:United Kingdom 出版社:Emerald Group Publishing Ltd.

期刊介绍

The journal aims to give a broad international coverage of subjects relating to the management of manufacturing technology and the integration of the design, production, marketing and supply functions of enterprises. Emphasis is placed on the publication of articles which seek to link theory with practical application or critically analyse real cases with the objective of identifying good practice in manufacturing.Articles may be based on empirical investigations, theoretical perspectives, case study analysis, or report experimental results. However, all submissions should make a significant original contribution to the field; be directly relevant to the management of manufacturing technology; and contain elements which have general application. If it is felt that a contribution, though technical in nature, will be of broad interest, it may be published under a "technical paper" heading. A paper can be considered for publication as a "research note" if it reports work-in-progress on research which has not yet reached a stage where there are any final results or conclusions. Its value will be judged by the extent to which it contributes to a debate on the research problem, methodology, techniques of data analysis, etc.

该期刊旨在广泛地涵盖与制造技术管理以及企业设计,生产,营销和供应功能的集成有关的主题。重点放在文章的发表上,这些文章试图将理论与实际应用联系起来,或者批判性地分析真实案例,目的是确定制造业的良好实践。文章可能基于经验调查,理论观点,案例研究分析或报告实验结果。但是,所有提交的材料都应为该领域做出重大的原始贡献; 与制造技术的管理直接相关; 并包含具有普遍应用的要素。如果认为一项贡献虽然是技术性的,但将具有广泛的兴趣,则可以在 “技术论文” 标题下发表。如果一篇论文报告了尚未达到任何最终结果或结论的研究进展,则可以考虑将其作为 “研究笔记” 发表。它的价值将根据它在多大程度上有助于就研究问题,方法,数据分析技术等进行辩论来判断。

年发文量 77
国人发稿量 21
国人发文占比 27.27%
自引率 13.7%
平均录取率 -
平均审稿周期 -
版面费 US$3370
偏重研究方向 Engineering-Control and Systems Engineering
期刊官网 http://www.emeraldgrouppublishing.com/products/journals/journals.htm?id=jmtm
投稿链接 -

质量指标占比

研究类文章占比 OA被引用占比 撤稿占比 出版后修正文章占比
98.70% 16.83% 0.00% 0.00%

相关指数

{{ relationActiveLabel }}
{{ item.label }}

期刊预警不是论文评价,更不是否定预警期刊发表的每项成果。《国际期刊预警名单(试行)》旨在提醒科研人员审慎选择成果发表平台、提示出版机构强化期刊质量管理。

预警期刊的识别采用定性与定量相结合的方法。通过专家咨询确立分析维度及评价指标,而后基于指标客观数据产生具体名单。

具体而言,就是通过综合评判期刊载文量、作者国际化程度、拒稿率、论文处理费(APC)、期刊超越指数、自引率、撤稿信息等,找出那些具备风险特征、具有潜在质量问题的学术期刊。最后,依据各刊数据差异,将预警级别分为高、中、低三档,风险指数依次减弱。

《国际期刊预警名单(试行)》确定原则是客观、审慎、开放。期刊分区表团队期待与科研界、学术出版机构一起,夯实科学精神,打造气正风清的学术诚信环境!真诚欢迎各界就预警名单的分析维度、使用方案、值得关切的期刊等提出建议!

预警情况 查看说明

时间 预警情况
2024年02月发布的2024版 不在预警名单中
2023年01月发布的2023版 不在预警名单中
2021年12月发布的2021版 不在预警名单中
2020年12月发布的2020版 不在预警名单中

JCR分区 WOS分区等级:Q1区

版本 按学科 分区
WOS期刊SCI分区
WOS期刊SCI分区是指SCI官方(Web of Science)为每个学科内的期刊按照IF数值排 序,将期刊按照四等分的方法划分的Q1-Q4等级,Q1代表质量最高,即常说的1区期刊。
(2021-2022年最新版)
MANAGEMENT Q1
ENGINEERING, INDUSTRIAL Q1
ENGINEERING, MANUFACTURING Q1

关于2019年中科院分区升级版(试行)

分区表升级版(试行)旨在解决期刊学科体系划分与学科发展以及融合趋势的不相容问题。由于学科交叉在当代科研活动的趋势愈发显著,学科体系构建容易引发争议。为了打破学科体系给期刊评价带来的桎梏,“升级版方案”首先构建了论文层级的主题体系,然后分别计算每篇论文在所属主题的影响力,最后汇总各期刊每篇论文分值,得到“期刊超越指数”,作为分区依据。

分区表升级版(试行)的优势:一是论文层级的主题体系既能体现学科交叉特点,又可以精准揭示期刊载文的多学科性;二是采用“期刊超越指数”替代影响因子指标,解决了影响因子数学性质缺陷对评价结果的干扰。整体而言,分区表升级版(试行)突破了期刊评价中学科体系构建、评价指标选择等瓶颈问题,能够更为全面地揭示学术期刊的影响力,为科研评价“去四唯”提供解决思路。相关研究成果经过国际同行的认可,已经发表在科学计量学领域国际重要期刊。

《2019年中国科学院文献情报中心期刊分区表升级版(试行)》首次将社会科学引文数据库(SSCI)期刊纳入到分区评估中。升级版分区表(试行)设置了包括自然科学和社会科学在内的18个大类学科。基础版和升级版(试行)将过渡共存三年时间,推测在此期间各大高校和科研院所仍可能会以基础版为考核参考标准。 提示:中科院分区官方微信公众号“fenqubiao”仅提供基础版数据查询,暂无升级版数据,请注意区分。

中科院分区 查看说明

版本 大类学科 小类学科 Top期刊 综述期刊
工程技术
2区
MANAGEMENT
管理学
3区
ENGINEERING, INDUSTRIAL
工程:工业
3区
ENGINEERING, MANUFACTURING
工程:制造
3区
2021年12月
基础版
工程技术
2区
ENGINEERING, INDUSTRIAL
工程:工业
2区
ENGINEERING, MANUFACTURING
工程:制造
3区
2021年12月
升级版
工程技术
2区
MANAGEMENT
管理学
3区
ENGINEERING, INDUSTRIAL
工程:工业
3区
ENGINEERING, MANUFACTURING
工程:制造
3区
2020年12月
旧的升级版
工程技术
2区
MANAGEMENT
管理学
3区
ENGINEERING, INDUSTRIAL
工程:工业
3区
ENGINEERING, MANUFACTURING
工程:制造
3区
2022年12月
最新升级版
工程技术
2区
MANAGEMENT
管理学
4区
ENGINEERING, INDUSTRIAL
工程:工业
3区
ENGINEERING, MANUFACTURING
工程:制造
3区