Multiattribute framework analysis for the identification of carbonate mounds in the Brazilian presalt zone

Abstract:
Carbonate mounds, as described herein, often present seismic characteristics such as low amplitude and a high density of faults and fractures, which can easily be oversampled and blur other rock features in simple geobody extraction processes. We have developed a workflow for combining geometric attributes and hybrid spectral decomposition (HSD) to efficiently identify good-quality reservoirs in carbonate mounds within the complex environment of the Brazilian presalt zone. To better identify these reservoirs within the seismic volume of carbonate mounds, we divide our methodology into four stages: seismic data acquisition and processing overview, preconditioning of seismic data using structural-oriented filtering and imaging enhancement, calculation of seismic attributes, and classification of seismic facies. Although coherence and curvature attributes are often used to identify high-density fault and fracture zones, representing one of the most important features of carbonate mounds, HSD is necessary to discriminate low-amplitude carbonate mounds (good reservoir quality) from low-amplitude clay zones (nonreservoir). Finally, we use a multiattribute facies classification to generate a geologically significant outcome and to guide a final geobody extraction that is calibrated by well data and that can be used as a spatial indicator of the distribution of good reservoir quality for static modeling. Introduction Brazil has been producing oil from presalt carbonate reservoirs over the past decade. Recently, these reservoirs attained an incredible output of just more than 1.7 million barrels of oil equivalent per day, representing more than half of the country’s daily production and demonstrating the importance of these carbonate reservoirs to Brazil. However, it is tremendously challenging to map and characterize these carbonate reservoirs given their considerable spatial heterogeneity, complex pore systems, and often ambiguous seismic responses. Burgess et al. (2013) define criteria for discriminating different carbonate features in a seismic image that involve: regional constraints, analysis of basic seismic geometries, and analyses of geophysical details and finer scale seismic geometries. For the purpose of this work, we adopted analyses of seismic geometries and geophysical details, as well as amplitude anomalies and the behavior of frequencies in the reservoir interval, together with the high density of faults and fractures, to define carbonate features, many of which were assessed at a subseismic scale (Wright and Rodriguez, 2018). Here, we propose a workflow for identifying and characterizing carbonate mounds in the Brazilian presalt zone using a combination of hybrid spectral decomposition (HSD) together with geometric attributes and curvature and coherence attributes. For this work, we use the term carbonate mounds to describe almost conical carbonate bodies of pronounced relief that are often difficult to map seismically due to their ambiguous limits and internal low-amplitude reflectors, but that exhibit excellent reservoir quality in terms of matrix and associated fracturing and that have been successfully drilled, evaluated, and tested. It is beyond the scope of this work to interpret these features further or to establish their depositional environment. For a broader perception of the many interpretations of these presalt carbonates we suggest, amongst others, the works of Wright and Barnett (2017) on Barra Velha Formation depositional systems, Buckley et al. (2015) on early Cretaceous lacustrine carbonate platforms, Wright and Barnett (2017) on depositional models for the presalt Barra Velha Formation, and Wright and Rodriguez (2018) on depositional interpretations of presalt environments and their links to seismic facies. Our Petrogal Brasil S.A., Rio de Janeiro, Brazil and Universidade Federal Fluminense, Niteroi, Brazil. E-mail: carlosfzk@gmail.com. Petrogal Brasil S.A., Rio de Janeiro, Brazil. E-mail: mariaolhoazul@petrogalbrasil.com. Universidade Federal Fluminense, Niteroi, Brazil. E-mail: wagnerlupinacci@id.uff.br. Emerson Automation Solutions, Rio de Janeiro, Brazil. E-mail: leandro.machado@emerson.com. Manuscript received by the Editor 3 January 2018; revised manuscript received 10 November 2018; published ahead of production 08 February 2019; published online 01 April 2019. This paper appears in Interpretation, Vol. 7, No. 2 (May 2019); p. T467–T476, 12 FIGS., 2 TABLES. http://dx.doi.org/10.1190/INT-2018-0004.1. © 2019 Society of Exploration Geophysicists and American Association of Petroleum Geologists. All rights reserved. t Technical papers Interpretation / May 2019 T467 D ow nl oa de d 04 /0 3/ 19 R ed is tr ib ut io n su bj ec t t o SE G li ce ns e or c op yr ig ht ; s ee T er m s of U se a t h ttp :// lib ra ry .s eg .o rg / workflow is focused on characterizing seismic facies and their relationship to present-day reservoir quality, which we believe can be applied and adjusted to different settings within the Brazilian presalt sequence. Our intent is to detail a workflow that can facilitate mapping of present-day good reservoir quality carbonate mound geometries to enable their characterization from a seismic perspective and to allow assessment of their spatial distribution for the purposes of reservoir modeling during the exploration and appraisal stages. Seismic attenuation can greatly affect the quality of seismic signals perpetuated at considerable depths (Lupinacci and Oliveira, 2015; Yuan et al., 2017). Consequently, mapping carbonate mounds in the Brazilian presalt fields, which lie at depths ranging between 5000 and 6000 m and below an approximately 2000 m thick layer of salt, is a major challenge for geoscientists because of low seismic illumination and low-amplitude anomalies, low impedance, and the high fault and fracture density that are characteristic of these geologic features. It is difficult to identify and delineate such features in these presalt fields using only seismic data because of the complexity of the seismic image generated and the absence of impedance contrast between the reservoir and adjacent sealing facies (Zheng et al., 2007). Despite many criteria for presalt seismic data having already been defined, we consider in this study that general information about the acquisition and processing of such data is essential to understanding its ambiguities and limitations. Furthermore, because seismic data can be contaminated by random and coherent noise arising from data acquisition or complex geology that can bias results even after data processing and migration (Chopra and Marfurt, 2007), data preconditioning is crucial to obtain good results (Lupinacci et al., 2017). With respect to carbonate reservoir characterization, seismic facies analysis is increasingly seen as an effective way of estimating reservoir properties (Matos et al., 2007), combining different seismic attributes through pattern recognition algorithms, such as seismic multiattributes analysis (Rongchang et al., 2017) to identify, for example, lateral changes in a reservoir. Seismic attributes are important tools for reservoir characterization that can help to visually enhance or quantify features of interest (Chopra and Marfurt, 2007). However, selection of seismic attributes for analysis should be made with caution so as not to propagate false interpretations. Curvature and coherence attributes can be used together in seismic multiattribute analyses to increase the reliability of this type of geologic analysis. The curvature attribute describes how bent a curve is at a point along its length (Roberts, 2001), focusing on changes in shape. This attribute is a good predictor of faults, as well as anticline and syncline structures (Klein et al., 2008) because it is not affected by variations in amplitude related to changes in lithology and fluid. The coherence cube attribute — a measure of the similarity between neighboring seismic traces in three dimensions — has been used since 1995 (Bahorich and Farmer, 1995) as a powerful seismic interpretation tool for imaging geologic discontinuities, such as faults and fractures, which are recurrently associated with carbonate mound features in this study area. However, many ways of calculating coherence can be implemented. Here, we applied the eigenvalue-coherence algorithm (Gersztenkorn and Marfurt, 1999; Marfurt et al., 1999), which uses several adjacent traces within a local window to estimate discontinuity for each sample. Spectral decomposition is another widely used attribute for identifying seismic patterns. It can represent the seismic trace in a frequency domain or in subbands of frequencies. It can be used to identify subtle thickness variations and discontinuities, as well as to predict bedding thicknesses (e.g., Partyka et al., 1999). Spectral decomposition can also be used to identify low-frequency shadow, which may indicate the presence of hydrocarbons (Sun et al., 2002; Wang, 2007) or as in this study, to identify good quality reservoirs upon calibration by the well-log porosity response. Additionally, a frequency bandwidth related to seismic facies can be selected from a spectral decomposition analysis, so a specific amplitude range can be isolated that represents a reservoir anomaly (called HSD) (Jesus et al., 2017). Pattern recognition and classification of seismic features is fundamental to seismic data interpretation (Zhao et al., 2015), so uniting different criteria through several seismic attributes and establishing seismic facies classes is an excellent approach for isolating reservoirs of good quality in presalt carbonate mounds from shale or tight zones (nonreservoir). We propose a workflow for identifying and characterizing carbonate mounds in the Brazilian presalt zone using a combination of HSD with curvature and coherence geometric attributes. We chose those attributes because of their ability to provide useful geologic inform
Author Listing: Carlos Jesus;Maria Olho Azul;Wagner Moreira Lupinacci;Leandro Machado
Volume: 7
Pages: None
DOI: 10.1190/INT-2018-0004.1
Language: English
Journal: Interpretation

Interpretation-A Journal of Subsurface Characterization

INTERPRETATION-J SUB

影响因子:1.1 是否综述期刊:否 是否OA:否 是否预警:不在预警名单内 发行时间:- ISSN:2324-8858 发刊频率:- 收录数据库:SCIE/Scopus收录 出版国家/地区:UNITED STATES 出版社:Society of Exploration Geophysicists

期刊介绍

***Jointly published by the American Association of Petroleum Geologists (AAPG) and the Society of Exploration Geophysicists (SEG)***Interpretation is a new, peer-reviewed journal for advancing the practice of subsurface interpretation.

*** 由美国石油地质学家协会(AAPG)和勘探地球物理学家协会(SEG)联合出版 ***《解释》是一本新的同行评审期刊,旨在促进地下解释实践。

年发文量 81
国人发稿量 50
国人发文占比 61.73%
自引率 9.1%
平均录取率 -
平均审稿周期 -
版面费 -
偏重研究方向 GEOCHEMISTRY & GEOPHYSICS-
期刊官网 -
投稿链接 -

质量指标占比

研究类文章占比 OA被引用占比 撤稿占比 出版后修正文章占比
98.77% 2.37% 0.00% 0.98%

相关指数

{{ relationActiveLabel }}
{{ item.label }}

期刊预警不是论文评价,更不是否定预警期刊发表的每项成果。《国际期刊预警名单(试行)》旨在提醒科研人员审慎选择成果发表平台、提示出版机构强化期刊质量管理。

预警期刊的识别采用定性与定量相结合的方法。通过专家咨询确立分析维度及评价指标,而后基于指标客观数据产生具体名单。

具体而言,就是通过综合评判期刊载文量、作者国际化程度、拒稿率、论文处理费(APC)、期刊超越指数、自引率、撤稿信息等,找出那些具备风险特征、具有潜在质量问题的学术期刊。最后,依据各刊数据差异,将预警级别分为高、中、低三档,风险指数依次减弱。

《国际期刊预警名单(试行)》确定原则是客观、审慎、开放。期刊分区表团队期待与科研界、学术出版机构一起,夯实科学精神,打造气正风清的学术诚信环境!真诚欢迎各界就预警名单的分析维度、使用方案、值得关切的期刊等提出建议!

预警情况 查看说明

时间 预警情况
2024年02月发布的2024版 不在预警名单中
2023年01月发布的2023版 不在预警名单中
2021年12月发布的2021版 不在预警名单中
2020年12月发布的2020版 不在预警名单中

JCR分区 WOS分区等级:Q3区

版本 按学科 分区
WOS期刊SCI分区
WOS期刊SCI分区是指SCI官方(Web of Science)为每个学科内的期刊按照IF数值排 序,将期刊按照四等分的方法划分的Q1-Q4等级,Q1代表质量最高,即常说的1区期刊。
(2021-2022年最新版)
GEOCHEMISTRY & GEOPHYSICS Q3

关于2019年中科院分区升级版(试行)

分区表升级版(试行)旨在解决期刊学科体系划分与学科发展以及融合趋势的不相容问题。由于学科交叉在当代科研活动的趋势愈发显著,学科体系构建容易引发争议。为了打破学科体系给期刊评价带来的桎梏,“升级版方案”首先构建了论文层级的主题体系,然后分别计算每篇论文在所属主题的影响力,最后汇总各期刊每篇论文分值,得到“期刊超越指数”,作为分区依据。

分区表升级版(试行)的优势:一是论文层级的主题体系既能体现学科交叉特点,又可以精准揭示期刊载文的多学科性;二是采用“期刊超越指数”替代影响因子指标,解决了影响因子数学性质缺陷对评价结果的干扰。整体而言,分区表升级版(试行)突破了期刊评价中学科体系构建、评价指标选择等瓶颈问题,能够更为全面地揭示学术期刊的影响力,为科研评价“去四唯”提供解决思路。相关研究成果经过国际同行的认可,已经发表在科学计量学领域国际重要期刊。

《2019年中国科学院文献情报中心期刊分区表升级版(试行)》首次将社会科学引文数据库(SSCI)期刊纳入到分区评估中。升级版分区表(试行)设置了包括自然科学和社会科学在内的18个大类学科。基础版和升级版(试行)将过渡共存三年时间,推测在此期间各大高校和科研院所仍可能会以基础版为考核参考标准。 提示:中科院分区官方微信公众号“fenqubiao”仅提供基础版数据查询,暂无升级版数据,请注意区分。

中科院分区 查看说明

版本 大类学科 小类学科 Top期刊 综述期刊
地球科学
4区
GEOCHEMISTRY & GEOPHYSICS
地球化学与地球物理
4区
2021年12月
基础版
地学
4区
GEOCHEMISTRY & GEOPHYSICS
地球化学与地球物理
4区
2021年12月
升级版
地球科学
4区
GEOCHEMISTRY & GEOPHYSICS
地球化学与地球物理
4区
2020年12月
旧的升级版
地球科学
4区
GEOCHEMISTRY & GEOPHYSICS
地球化学与地球物理
4区
2022年12月
最新升级版
地球科学
4区
GEOCHEMISTRY & GEOPHYSICS
地球化学与地球物理
4区