Zhurnal Voprosy Neirokhirurgii Imeni N.N. Burdenko 投稿命中率-刊鹿论文编译

[A comparative study of the efficacy and safety of the eyebrow supraorbital approach in cerebral aneurysm surgery].

Abstract:

OBJECTIVE\nThe study objective was to compare the efficacy and safety of supraorbital eyebrow (SEA) and pterional (PA) approaches in surgery of anterior circle of Willis (ACW) aneurysms and to determine the advantages and disadvantages of SEA in aneurysm clipping.\n\n\nMATERIAL AND METHODS\nThe analysis included 166 patients with ACW aneurysms aged 18 to 70 years who were treated in the Neurosurgery Department of the Interregional Clinical Diagnostic Center (Kazan) in the period from 2013 to 2016. At the first stage of the study, factors affecting surgical outcomes were compared (by using the Glasgow outcome scale (GOS)) in subpopulations of patients operated on using SEA (n=49) and PA (n=117). At the second stage, we compared the efficacy and safety of approaches using a case-control subanalysis in appropriate subgroups of the SEA (n=37) and PA (n=37) groups. The subgroups were comparable in the following factors: gender, age, severity of subarachnoid hemorrhage (SAH) on (Fisher scale), severity of the patient s condition (Hunt-Hess scale), size and location of the aneurysm, surgery duration, intraoperative aneurysm rupture (IOAR), amount of blood loss, rate of frontal sinus surgery, rate of nasal CSF leak, rate of intraoperative and postoperative complications, hemorrhagic and ischemic complications according to postoperative CT, patient s satisfaction with the cosmetic result of surgery (visual analogue scale - VAS), and treatment outcomes (GOS). Treatment outcomes (GOS) and patient s satisfaction with the cosmetic result of surgery (VAS) were considered as the efficacy parameters. The safety parameters included the amount of blood loss, rate of frontal sinus surgery, rate of nasal CSF leak, and rate of intraoperative and postoperative (hemorrhagic and ischemic) complications.\n\n\nRESULTS\nAt the first stage of the study, we found that the amount of intraoperative blood loss in the subpopulation of patients with ACW aneurysms who were operated on using SEA was statistically significantly less than that in the PA group (p=0.0000002). In the postoperative period, patients who underwent surgery using SEA less frequently experienced neurological deficit (p=0.003), less frequently developed first epileptic seizures (p=0.035), and had a lower rate of hemorrhagic complications (p=0.003) and better treatment outcomes (GOS) (p=0.01). Comparison of appropriate subgroups in the SEA and PA groups, which were selected according to the case-control methodology and were comparable in the main factors affecting treatment outcomes, confirmed statistically significantly lower blood loss for SEA (p=0.0000002) than for PA. Compared to the SEA group, the PA group was characterized by more frequent, but not statistically significantly different, IOAR (p=1), postoperative worsening of neurological deficit (p=0.115), newly developed epileptic seizures (p=0.493), and hemorrhagic complications (p=0.0557). There were no deaths in both groups. In the SEA group, the treatment outcome was scored 4 and 5 (GOS, favorable outcome); in the PA group, the treatment outcome was scored 3 (GOS) in 2 (5.4%) patients and 4 or 5 in 35 (94.6%) patients (p=0.063). The mean subjective score of satisfaction with the treatment result (VAS) in the SEA group was significantly higher (9.4±1) than in the PA group (8.8±1; p=0.01).\n\n\nCONCLUSION\nSEA is an adequate approach for clipping ACW aneurysms, in particular ACA-AComA and MCA aneurysms, which is as effective and safe as the pterional approach.

Author Listing： A G Alekseev;A A Pichugin;G V Danilov;N G Shayakhmetov;V I Danilov

Volume： 83 1

Pages： \n 40-52\n

DOI： 10.17116/neiro20198301140

Language： English

Journal： Zhurnal voprosy neirokhirurgii imeni N. N. Burdenko

Zhurnal Voprosy Neirokhirurgii Imeni N.N. Burdenko

影响因子：0.0

是否综述期刊：否

是否OA：否

是否预警：不在预警名单内

发行时间：-

ISSN：0042-8817

发刊频率：-

收录数据库：Scopus收录

出版国家/地区：-

出版社：Media Sphera Publishing Group

期刊介绍

年发文量	-
国人发稿量	-
国人发文占比	-
自引率	0.0%
平均录取率	-
平均审稿周期	-
版面费	-
偏重研究方向	Medicine-Neurology (clinical)
期刊官网	-
投稿链接	-

质量指标占比

研究类文章占比	OA被引用占比	撤稿占比	出版后修正文章占比
0.00%	0.00%	-	-

预警情况查看说明

时间	预警情况
2024年02月发布的2024版	不在预警名单中
2023年01月发布的2023版	不在预警名单中
2021年12月发布的2021版	不在预警名单中
2020年12月发布的2020版	不在预警名单中

JCR分区 WOS分区等级：Q0区

版本	按学科	分区
WOS期刊SCI分区 WOS期刊SCI分区是指SCI官方（Web of Science）为每个学科内的期刊按照IF数值排序，将期刊按照四等分的方法划分的Q1-Q4等级，Q1代表质量最高，即常说的1区期刊。（2021-2022年最新版）

关于2019年中科院分区升级版（试行）

分区表升级版（试行）旨在解决期刊学科体系划分与学科发展以及融合趋势的不相容问题。由于学科交叉在当代科研活动的趋势愈发显著，学科体系构建容易引发争议。为了打破学科体系给期刊评价带来的桎梏，“升级版方案”首先构建了论文层级的主题体系，然后分别计算每篇论文在所属主题的影响力，最后汇总各期刊每篇论文分值，得到“期刊超越指数”，作为分区依据。

分区表升级版（试行）的优势：一是论文层级的主题体系既能体现学科交叉特点，又可以精准揭示期刊载文的多学科性；二是采用“期刊超越指数”替代影响因子指标，解决了影响因子数学性质缺陷对评价结果的干扰。整体而言，分区表升级版（试行）突破了期刊评价中学科体系构建、评价指标选择等瓶颈问题，能够更为全面地揭示学术期刊的影响力，为科研评价“去四唯”提供解决思路。相关研究成果经过国际同行的认可，已经发表在科学计量学领域国际重要期刊。

《2019年中国科学院文献情报中心期刊分区表升级版（试行）》首次将社会科学引文数据库（SSCI）期刊纳入到分区评估中。升级版分区表（试行）设置了包括自然科学和社会科学在内的18个大类学科。基础版和升级版（试行）将过渡共存三年时间，推测在此期间各大高校和科研院所仍可能会以基础版为考核参考标准。提示：中科院分区官方微信公众号“fenqubiao”仅提供基础版数据查询，暂无升级版数据，请注意区分。

中科院分区查看说明

版本	大类学科	小类学科	Top期刊	综述期刊
暂无数据