International Journal of Intelligence, Security, and Public Affairs 投稿命中率-刊鹿论文编译

A Revolutionary Act: Analyse First to Decide Afterwards

Abstract:

It is somehow discouraging to discover that many things that were already highlighted in the previous editorial are still valid. We reach 2019 with the persistence of many problems previously mentioned and others which have been sharpened. As well as others which were considered more less channelled and might be hindered. It is true that we should not forget what Steven Pinker reminds us in his work “Enlightenment Now: The Case for Reason, Science, Humanism, and Progress.” We are told there how things, at a global scale, have improved. And it is true: respect for Human Rights and democratic law as a basic rule of coexistence have increased; scientific advances have improved our lives by providing us with better health and higher life expectancy rates. Moreover, economic and social transformations have managed to lift millions of people out of poverty. Internet’s arrival and the development of technology is creating a more interconnected world in which we all have access to the world’s knowledge, etc. To say that we have not achieved any progress would be very demagogic. Nevertheless, although it is true that negative things are more appealing, to say that we live in the best world of all the possible ones would be of great cynicism. Beyond the grandiloquent declarations of our political leaders and international organizations, there are still situations of injustice and appearances (illusions, facades) of power and privilege that leave much to be desired. It is true that uncertainty is part of our reality: nowadays our world is revealing itself with wars; racism; xenophobia; terrorism; corruption; organized crime; environmental disasters; populisms; mistrust in democratic institutions; with the resurgence of the nuclear threat; Russia and its aggressions; China expanding; Europe at a stage of possible fragmentation; Venezuela getting more and more problematic and uncertain; India and Pakistan confronting; andAfricamoving towards anAfrican CommonMarket, etc. Interconnectivity and the increase of players and actors in the public scene make everything much more uncertain. To all of this, we have to add the world of drones and the invisibility that they entail; the internet of things; artificial intelligence. Technology that helps us build a better world also contributes to insecurity; robotisation; the use of nanotechnology. We tend to think that as maths are involved in algorithms, it makes them neutral. However, algorithms enclose opinions and the possibility of being manipulated or hacked. As well as the war of storytelling through fake news constitute, among others, a range of problems where intelligence and Intelligence Services have to, and are expected to, provide an answer. Out of all this, the responsibility that we have at the present time is detached. A present that, on the other hand, exhausted in itself, becomes unbearable. Moreover, all along with these situations and concerning problems, we would like to briefly underline in a special manner the following: lack of leadership and the “stupidity” of politico-social leaders that do not live up to the demand of the current problems both nationally and internationally. As almost always, what bring us more problems are not so much what we do not know but what our leaders think they do and they actually do not. The environmental awareness and climate change has ceased to be a possibility to become a reality with economic consequences (consumption, production...), displacements, health and ultimately of insecurity. On the other hand, we are witnessing a degradation of democracy and its institutions as they feel incapable of giving concrete answers to the vital problems of the majority of their citizens. THE INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF INTELLIGENCE, SECURITY, AND PUBLIC AFFAIRS 2019, VOL. 21, NO. 1, 1–3 https://doi.org/10.1080/23800992.2019.1598089

Author Listing： Fernando Velasco Fernández

Volume： 21

Pages： 1 - 3

DOI： 10.1080/23800992.2019.1598089

Language： English

Journal： The International Journal of Intelligence, Security, and Public Affairs

International Journal of Intelligence, Security, and Public Affairs

影响因子：0.0

是否综述期刊：否

是否OA：否

是否预警：不在预警名单内

发行时间：-

ISSN：2380-0992

发刊频率：-

收录数据库：Scopus收录

出版国家/地区：-

出版社：Taylor & Francis

期刊介绍

年发文量	-
国人发稿量	-
国人发文占比	-
自引率	0.0%
平均录取率	-
平均审稿周期	-
版面费	-
偏重研究方向	Social Sciences-Political Science and International Relations
期刊官网	-
投稿链接	-

质量指标占比

研究类文章占比	OA被引用占比	撤稿占比	出版后修正文章占比
0.00%	0.00%	-	-

预警情况查看说明

时间	预警情况
2024年02月发布的2024版	不在预警名单中
2023年01月发布的2023版	不在预警名单中
2021年12月发布的2021版	不在预警名单中
2020年12月发布的2020版	不在预警名单中

JCR分区 WOS分区等级：Q0区

版本	按学科	分区
WOS期刊SCI分区 WOS期刊SCI分区是指SCI官方（Web of Science）为每个学科内的期刊按照IF数值排序，将期刊按照四等分的方法划分的Q1-Q4等级，Q1代表质量最高，即常说的1区期刊。（2021-2022年最新版）

关于2019年中科院分区升级版（试行）

分区表升级版（试行）旨在解决期刊学科体系划分与学科发展以及融合趋势的不相容问题。由于学科交叉在当代科研活动的趋势愈发显著，学科体系构建容易引发争议。为了打破学科体系给期刊评价带来的桎梏，“升级版方案”首先构建了论文层级的主题体系，然后分别计算每篇论文在所属主题的影响力，最后汇总各期刊每篇论文分值，得到“期刊超越指数”，作为分区依据。

分区表升级版（试行）的优势：一是论文层级的主题体系既能体现学科交叉特点，又可以精准揭示期刊载文的多学科性；二是采用“期刊超越指数”替代影响因子指标，解决了影响因子数学性质缺陷对评价结果的干扰。整体而言，分区表升级版（试行）突破了期刊评价中学科体系构建、评价指标选择等瓶颈问题，能够更为全面地揭示学术期刊的影响力，为科研评价“去四唯”提供解决思路。相关研究成果经过国际同行的认可，已经发表在科学计量学领域国际重要期刊。

《2019年中国科学院文献情报中心期刊分区表升级版（试行）》首次将社会科学引文数据库（SSCI）期刊纳入到分区评估中。升级版分区表（试行）设置了包括自然科学和社会科学在内的18个大类学科。基础版和升级版（试行）将过渡共存三年时间，推测在此期间各大高校和科研院所仍可能会以基础版为考核参考标准。提示：中科院分区官方微信公众号“fenqubiao”仅提供基础版数据查询，暂无升级版数据，请注意区分。

中科院分区查看说明

版本	大类学科	小类学科	Top期刊	综述期刊
暂无数据