Journal of studies on alcohol and drugs. Supplement 年发文量-刊鹿论文编译

The Need for Needs-Based Planning: A Commentary

Abstract:

112 MODELING TECHNIQUES ARE COMMONPLACE in many fields. Health economic applications, for example, use modeling to forecast lifetime quality-adjusted life years in cost-effectiveness analysis. These models typically take a broad perspective, attempting to model national policy impacts or to be representative of the national population. Modeling techniques are also common in the management and organization literatures, where planning models are used to help specific organizations, such as hospitals, develop and implement strategic plans to address emerging issues. Less common, however, are models to help local governments make decisions regarding the substance use treatment needs of their population. Three articles in this supplement help fill this gap and highlight the potential utility that models to support needsbased planning can have if tailored for local governmental authorities. Brennan and colleagues (2019) illustrate how an existing modeling framework can be adapted for local authorities in England to predict alcohol treatment need and allow a variety of “what-if ” scenarios to be assessed. Hirschovits-Gerz and colleagues (2019) demonstrate how national data can be used to develop local models of substance use treatment need for seven Finnish municipalities. Mota and colleagues (2019) illustrate the use of local data to support a model of substance use treatment need for São Paulo, Brazil. Taken as a group, these three articles show the potential of modeling for local substance use policy. Local policymakers urgently need the information that such models can provide since it is often local policy that has the biggest impact on people’s lives. For example, the U.S. federal response to the opioid epidemic has been slow, but local efforts to address the opioid epidemic have moved at a much faster pace. One such effort in Guilford County, NC, involves partnering local government with researchers at the University of North Carolina at Greensboro to support peer outreach, needle exchange, and naloxone kits for first responders to help prevent opioid overdose deaths. Although Guilford County is fully committed to combating the opioid epidemic, like all local governments its budget is limited and, therefore, it needs COMMENTARY

Author Listing： Jeremy W Bray

Volume： Sup 18

Pages： 112 - 113

DOI： 10.15288/JSADS.2019.S18.112

Language： English

Journal： Journal of Studies on Alcohol and Drugs. Supplement

Journal of studies on alcohol and drugs. Supplement

影响因子：0.0

是否综述期刊：否

是否OA：否

是否预警：不在预警名单内

发行时间：-

ISSN：1946-584X

发刊频率：-

收录数据库：Scopus收录

出版国家/地区：-

出版社：Alcohol Research Documentation, Inc.

期刊介绍

年发文量	-
国人发稿量	-
国人发文占比	-
自引率	0.0%
平均录取率	-
平均审稿周期	-
版面费	-
偏重研究方向	Medicine-Medicine (all)
期刊官网	-
投稿链接	-

质量指标占比

研究类文章占比	OA被引用占比	撤稿占比	出版后修正文章占比
0.00%	0.00%	-	-

预警情况查看说明

时间	预警情况
2024年02月发布的2024版	不在预警名单中
2023年01月发布的2023版	不在预警名单中
2021年12月发布的2021版	不在预警名单中
2020年12月发布的2020版	不在预警名单中

JCR分区 WOS分区等级：Q0区

版本	按学科	分区
WOS期刊SCI分区 WOS期刊SCI分区是指SCI官方（Web of Science）为每个学科内的期刊按照IF数值排序，将期刊按照四等分的方法划分的Q1-Q4等级，Q1代表质量最高，即常说的1区期刊。（2021-2022年最新版）

关于2019年中科院分区升级版（试行）

分区表升级版（试行）旨在解决期刊学科体系划分与学科发展以及融合趋势的不相容问题。由于学科交叉在当代科研活动的趋势愈发显著，学科体系构建容易引发争议。为了打破学科体系给期刊评价带来的桎梏，“升级版方案”首先构建了论文层级的主题体系，然后分别计算每篇论文在所属主题的影响力，最后汇总各期刊每篇论文分值，得到“期刊超越指数”，作为分区依据。

分区表升级版（试行）的优势：一是论文层级的主题体系既能体现学科交叉特点，又可以精准揭示期刊载文的多学科性；二是采用“期刊超越指数”替代影响因子指标，解决了影响因子数学性质缺陷对评价结果的干扰。整体而言，分区表升级版（试行）突破了期刊评价中学科体系构建、评价指标选择等瓶颈问题，能够更为全面地揭示学术期刊的影响力，为科研评价“去四唯”提供解决思路。相关研究成果经过国际同行的认可，已经发表在科学计量学领域国际重要期刊。

《2019年中国科学院文献情报中心期刊分区表升级版（试行）》首次将社会科学引文数据库（SSCI）期刊纳入到分区评估中。升级版分区表（试行）设置了包括自然科学和社会科学在内的18个大类学科。基础版和升级版（试行）将过渡共存三年时间，推测在此期间各大高校和科研院所仍可能会以基础版为考核参考标准。提示：中科院分区官方微信公众号“fenqubiao”仅提供基础版数据查询，暂无升级版数据，请注意区分。

中科院分区查看说明

版本	大类学科	小类学科	Top期刊	综述期刊
暂无数据